Evgeny Morozov Essay

Evgeny Morozovs article, Technologys Role in Revolution, was very attention-grabbing. Evgeny argued that some revolutions through appear bill do non transpire through mesh and technology, however if in effect, are skeletal framed by cultural factors. His term, cyber-utopianism, suggests that online interaction between individuals is emancipatory, and that the lucre favours the oppressed, rather than the oppressor. He shakes evident, that this belief is nieve and stubborn because it refuses to recognize its consequences. Evgeny argues against the certain ideas of what he refers to as internet centrism, and cyber-utopianism, and indeed points tabu that there is a sable side to internet freedom.Within Evgenys article, there are many points he makes that definitely articulate cyber-utopianism, and its affect on many populations. Evgeny explains the routine of internet in the middle- eastern revolutions. He suggests that, commonwealth in the middle-east lots brag about docu menting police brutality, but is not what they should be counsel on. He argues that they should focus on how new leaders testament shape the new constitution, and how to deal with issues regarding previous regimes. Morozov believes that the middle-east can obtain successful democracy, but depending on how they can react, and work on existing problems.Evgeny implies that regimes would be a lot slight hectic if it werent for the internet. He claims, if it the internet wasnt around, they could call for payoffn a different route in devising decisions, could harbor been less violent, and decisions could call for been made months earlier than they did. He explains how in Russia, kids were being so confuse by other websites that, for a compact while, administration had put up censorships so people would be less distracted. He believes that the most successful way of controlling the internet, isnt mavin that has the most modern censorship, but one that doesnt need a one at all . In addition, Evgeny suggested that it is nieve to believe that something as complex and sophisticated as the internet, could create exactly the same outcomes. In conclusion, he creates an unpretentious approach of dealing with policy do Cyber-realism.Cyber-realists are people that make the internet a method for achieving specific policy objectives, rather than,people who only focus on the internets philosophical feign as a whole. Evgeny makes some remarkable points, and although I think he slightly dramatizes the ban impacts internet has on the utilitarian states, he let off manages to convince me of his argument. For instance, I too, believe that internet is credited for some detrimental things such as countries having lacked enlightenment in the topic of political decisions, being a distraction rather than a source of information, and finally, heavy(p) the politics a disloyal reputation. 1Evgeny suggests that certain countries do not have the ability to be notified of p olitical suggestions online, because computers are not available to them. A relatable example he expresses is that, Fidel Castro has a twitter page, but people in Cuba, do not have computers, let alone twitter. In Italy, for example, only three hundred and sixty seven people have computers, out of one thousand people. Thats less than half of the population that would not be well informed. In addition, in places such as Russia, internet isnt a system intended to gain information, but rather, a search engine utilized for personal enjoyment.Internet is often a way of keeping kids away from politics because they become far to distracted on other sites, such as RuTube, to focus on government issues. I agree this is a negative effect, because if kids are uninformed, their kids give be uninformed, and the pattern of using internet for personal use will take its toll on future generations. Other countries, such as mating Korea and Belarus, lack the ability to be technologically caught up in society. Evgeny mentions, I wouldnt have much hope in the internet in North Korea. Its a country with some of the fewest internet connections in the world, and average North Koreans have been brainwashed to such an effect that you have serious psychological challenges that you cant overcome still by using blogs and twitter. This expresses the internet as being an unfair value to certain countries that are not as technologically advanced. Additionally, internet is giving the government a bad reputation for two different reasons. showtime off, Evgeny states that bloggers publishing about dishonesty in local governments, are slowly co-opted by higher politicians, and are turned against what they were blogging about. In this case, bloggers are abruptly being shut down, in that the power of the governmentis less on local authorities, but on the federal government. This demonstrates the government being disloyal to the people, and using a pessimistic way of controlling the local p opulation, which in turn, can certainly lead to trust issues between the two. Secondly, the government will frequently reach out to citizens for their opinion, but it doesnt necessarily typify that they are listening to what the citizens have to say. 2Evgeny suggests that governments pretend to reach out to obtain citizens input, but in reality, it is only a way of making them seem legitimate. The problem with this is that it causes the government to lose power, in that, they can no longer be trusted by the people, therefore the people will slowly stop publicizing their input.Another topic he could have reached upon would be that, because internet is so traceable, some negative things that might have gone viral will always be traced back to you. When bloggers deliver anti-government information, they are giving out their location, and can easily be track by local policemen. Overall I think that Evgeny truly positive(p) me of his argument because he had some very valid ideas, and as he pointed out, there are plenty of reasons people blame internet for the negative effects it has on the revolution.